Overall opinion
In our opinion the LTCCP of Regional Council dated 30 June 2006 provides a reasonable basis for long term integrated decision-making by the Regional Council and for participation in decision-making by the public and subsequent accountability to the community about the activities of the Regional Council.
It is not our responsibility to express an opinion on the merits of any policy content within the LTCCP.
In forming our overall opinion, we considered our opinion on specific matters required by the Act, which is set out below.
Opinion on specific matters required by the Act
The Auditor-General is required by section 94(1) of the Act to report on:
- the extent to which the LTCCP complies with the requirements of the Act;
- the quality of information and assumptions underlying the forecast information provided in the LTCCP; and
- the extent to which the forecast information and performance measures will provide an appropriate framework for the meaningful assessment of the actual levels of service provision.
In terms of our obligation to report on the matters outlined in section 94(1) of the Act, in our opinion:
- the Regional Council has complied with the requirements of the Act in all material respects demonstrating good practice for a Council of its size and scale within the context of its environment;
- the underlying information used to prepare the LTCCP provides a reasonable basis for the preparation of the forecast information;
- the assumptions set out within the LTCCP are based on best information currently available to the Regional Council and provide a reasonable and supportable basis for the preparation of the forecast information;
- the forecast information has been properly prepared on the basis of the underlying information and the assumptions adopted and the financial information is presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting practice in New Zealand;
- the extent to which the forecast information and performance measures provide an appropriate framework for the meaningful assessment of the actual levels of service provision reflects good practice for a Council of its size and scale within the context of its environment.
Actual results are likely to be different from the forecast information since anticipated events frequently do not occur as expected and the variation may be material. Accordingly, we express no opinion as to whether the forecasts will be achieved.
Our report was completed on 30 June 2006, and is the date at which our opinion is expressed.
The basis of the opinion is explained below. In addition, we outline the responsibilities of the Regional Council and the Auditor, and explain our independence.